|
|
|
Archives
• Current Entries
• August 2010 • June 2010 • May 2010 • April 2010 • March 2010 • January 2010 • December 2009 • November 2009 • October 2009 • September 2009 • August 2009 • July 2009 • June 2009 • May 2009 • April 2009 • February 2009 • January 2009 • December 2008 • November 2008 • October 2008 • September 2008 • August 2008 • June 2008 • May 2008 • April 2008
Latest Entries
Loading...
|
Human Resources
This area deals with assessing the need for and the supply of professional and other personnel. Functions include recruitment, selection, training, compensation, and evaluation of such personnel and examining ways to evaluate productivity and monitor accountability for results.
Diversity
Posted by:
Gustave Krauss on
September 7, 2009 at
5:56PM EST
The questions:
Is diversity important to a health care organization? How does it affect recruiting, team dynamics, and business outcomes? Are these affects positive or negative and why?
Response:
From my viewpoint, the cultural impact of diversity on the organization has been slow but steady over the past half century. Diversity, as it strives for goals of awareness of the humanness of all, seemed to direct the goal of awareness through education toward an acceptance (or sometimes I’ve heard tolerance) of differences. The next stream of consideration is that the differences people bring to the workplace expand the possibilities that could emerge, and in so doing, promote a more dynamic and richer business as well as a more satisfying work-life for individuals. I think those goals of acceptance and tolerance under the diversity umbrella, when differences are openly acknowledged, is noble. The topic of whether the affects of diversity is positive or negative on recruiting, team dynamics and business outcomes is not one that can be answered. The dynamics of teams, recruitment, and business outcomes are so varied that to ascribe success or failure because of one variable is too simplistic in my view which is supported by the absence of such questions in the literature that I’ve read. However, of more importance is what the limited literature does indicate. As was described in a textbook: Most leading HCOs strive to promote diversity in their workforce, but limited evidence suggests that the concept is not widely adopted,[17] and surveys show that women and minorities are still underrepresented in management.[18] Diversity advocates pursue affirmative action vigorously and make a deliberate effort to represent the ethnic and gender makeup of their community in their medical staff, management group, and workforce.[19] They adapt job requirements to family needs and work to promote women in management.[20] While this may be driven in part by a belief in the need for justice, it is also supported by sound marketing theories. Many people seek healthcare from caregivers who resemble them in gender, language, or culture. Increasing attention to the needs of female workers has clearly influenced the structure of employment benefits and the rules of the workplace. Intensive programs may be necessary to correct historical deficiency.[21] Human resources monitors all these policies and designs and maintains programs to promote their success. (This is from “The
Well-Managed Healthcare Organization,” Sixth Edition, and I didn’t include the
references) In short, I think diversity is most positive when the
HCO workforce mirrors the community population that it serves. This echoes what Kevin said in another
post. When that occurs, internal HCO
initiatives of recruiting, issues of team dynamics and successful business
outcomes benefit and support the HCO although research on this position is
limited or absent.
Send This | Categories:
|