|
|
|
Archives
• Current Entries
• February 2010 • January 2010 • December 2009 • November 2009 • October 2009 • September 2009 • August 2009 • July 2009 • May 2009 • April 2009 • March 2009 • February 2009 • January 2009 • December 2008 • October 2008 • September 2008 • August 2008 • July 2008 • May 2008
Latest Entries
Loading...
|
Exam Discussion
October 2009
Thursday October 29, 2009
Posted by: Vendla Esler at 12:30PM EST on October 29, 2009
I have a quesion first not related - what is the difference between community discussion and exam discussion areas ?
Now on question 6 antitrust laws I am not certain why the answer excludes physician contracts it does pertain to physician contracts and there needs to be clear evaluation any contracts to make sure stark laws are not compromised. Wednesday October 28, 2009
Posted by: Bruce Lawrey at 3:30PM EST on October 28, 2009
I do not have much experience with writing business plans. Does anyone have tips to share regarding writing a business plan? Are there any recommended resources that would help guide me through the process step-by-step? I appreciate any experiences you can share. Thursday October 22, 2009
Posted by: Bruce Lawrey at 5:08PM EST on October 22, 2009
With Sarbanes-Oxley in place, I am wondering just how involved non-profits are in comparison to public companies. For example, it seems to me that in healthcare directors and executives have always been underpaid for what is expected of them. Is this something actively scrutinized with the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley? Do non-profit organizations follow the requirement to have separate audit committees? I am curious about the extent that Sarbanes-Oxley truly influences non-profit institutions. I appreciate any comments on this area of discussion from week 10. Monday October 12, 2009
Posted by: Bruce Lawrey at 3:06PM EST on October 12, 2009
This is more of an observation than question, however the ethics involved in managed care seems quite complicated. Throughout the presentation the discussion was that, the Provider was only interested in helping to keep patients well enough until they could be passed on to another responsible party, which may be Medicare or another HSO. This is the first time I heard that physicians or LIPs have to sign “gag” orders in some circumstances. How can this be ethical? Does anyone have more information to share related to “gag” orders? |